by Keegan Calligar
Excellent journalists have the ability to research, investigate and report on breaking news in a diminutive amount of time while experiencing the pressure of a deadline. Journalists Ian Shapira and Tom Jackman of the Washington Post, David R. Anderson of the Oregonian, Bruce Nolan of The Times Times-Picayune, Jeff Whelan and John Hassell of The Star-Ledger and Janet Wilson, Lance Pugmire and Monte Morin of the Los Angeles Times all have won the Pulitzer prize for their breaking news reporting, and all exemplify the best in deadline-driven reporting.
Shapira and Jackman won the Pulitzer in 2008 for their reporting on the Virginia Tech shootings. Even before the article begins, the reader has a clear idea of what the story is on, as the headline is direct and succinct: “Gunman Kills 32 at Virginia Tech In Deadliest Shooting in U.S. History.”
The story’s lead also provides a great deal of information in a small amount of words, thereby providing a lot of details for readers who do not have the time to read the entire article: “An outburst of gunfire at a Virginia Tech dormitory, followed two hours later by a ruthless string of attacks at a classroom building, killed 32 students, faculty and staff and left about 30 others injured yesterday in the deadliest shooting rampage in the nation’s history.”
The writers use direct quotes from school officials, legitimizing the story for readers: “I’m really at a loss for words to explain or to understand the carnage that has visited our campus,” said Charles W. Steger, president of Virginia Tech, one of the state’s largest and most prestigious universities.”
The story contains an impressive amount of information about the attacks in the short time afterwards, allowing readers to better understand what happened: “The shooter, whose name was not released last night, wore bluejeans, a blue jacket and a vest holding ammunition, witnesses said. He carried a 9mm semiautomatic and a .22-caliber handgun, both with the serial numbers obliterated, federal law enforcement officials said.”
Perhaps the two most powerful components of the story are its accompanying photographs and the use of eyewitness accounts. The photographs depict officers carrying wounded, bloodied students out of the buildings, as well as officers running to help students.
The eyewitness accounts also provide a look at the attacks that no statement would have been able to. When reading an eyewitness account, the reader truly feels the emotion and gravity of the situation: “”He knew exactly what he was doing,” said the witness, Trey Perkins, 20, of Yorktown, Va. He said he watched the man enter his classroom and shoot Perkins’s professor in the head. “I have no idea why he did what he decided to do. I just can’t say how lucky I am to have made it.”
Anderson won the Pulitzer in 2007 for his reporting on a family lost in the woods of Oregon. Anderson’s headline and subhead provide a general idea of the story, allowing the reader to gain a great deal of information without having to read the whole article: “Rescuers find mom, kids, but not dad-Southern Oregon | The search pushes on for James Kim, following tracks left after he went for help”
The article’s lead explains the situation in more detail than the headline and subhead, but is still succinct and clear: “A private rescue helicopter Monday plucked a California woman and her two young daughters from a snowy mountain road where they were stranded for nine days, spurring a frantic search into the night for her husband.”
Anderson provides many details about the family’s plight, including how they managed to survive in the wilderness for nine days. For the reader, the inclusion of many facts legitimizes the story and allows the reader to trust the author: “The family kept warm during freezing nights by running the car engine. When the gas tank went dry, they burned the car’s tires. Searchers said the family had little food and the mother nursed her daughters.”
The journalist also quotes officials, further developing the story: “Oregon State Police Lt. Doug Ladd said there was “a very reasonable chance” that Kim is alive and that the family said he had some outdoor experience.”
Anderson also describes what the missing man is wearing, proving that while remaining objective, journalism can help in missing people cases: “Kim is wearing blue jeans, a sweater, a light jacket and tennis shoes. He’s carrying two cigarette lighters, and his wife thinks he may have taken a camera strobe with him, Anderson said.”
Nolan won the Pulitzer in 2006 for his reporting on Hurricane Katrina. Like those of the previous writers, Nolan’s headline and subhead allow the reader to gain a great deal of information in seconds: “CATASTROPHIC- Storm surge swamps 9th ward, St. Bernard”
Throughout the article, Nolan compares Katrina to other well known natural disasters, in order for the reader to understand just how destructive the storm was. He first compares Katrina to Hurricane Betsy, which is appropriate, as the paper is local and local residents will best remember Betsy and her devastation: “Hurricane Katrina struck metropolitan New Orleans on Monday with a staggering blow, far surpassing Hurricane Betsy, the landmark disaster of an earlier generation.”
Nolan’s syntax also evokes emotion in the reader: “As with Betsy, people scrambled into their attics or atop their roofs, pleading for help from the few passers-by.”
He also provides many facts about the story, legitimizing the story for readers, as well as allowing them to best understand what happened: “The powerful Category 4 storm crossed the coast near the mouth of the Pearl River shortly after daybreak with winds of 135 mph. Naval Air Station-Joint Reserve Base in Belle Chasse reported an early morning gust of 105 mph.”
Nolan speculates about what will happen in the near future, allowing the reader to anticipate what will come next: “There were no confirmed reports of fatalities in New Orleans, although officials, including Gov. Kathleen Blanco, said they expected to find bodies in rescue efforts today.”
The journalist also explains the damage in straightforward language, making it easier for a reader to digest and understand: “The famous oaks along St. Charles Avenue and its Uptown side streets were shattered. The avenue was made impassable by thickets of downed trees, many entangled with downed utility poles and criss- crossing power lines. Parked cars were smashed; many trees fell onto houses they once shaded.”
Whelan and Hassel won the Pulitzer in 2005 for their reporting on New Jersey governor Jim McGreevey’s resignation following a homosexual affair. The article’s headline and subhead are straightforward and clear, and provide a lot of information: “McGreevey quits, admits gay affair – Governor plans to leave office Nov. 15 – Ex-aide expected to sue, claiming sexual harassment”
The writers use direct quotes from multiple sources, including McGreevey, legitimizing the story for readers and gaining their trust: “”Shamefully, I engaged in an adult consensual affair with another man, which violates my bonds of matrimony,” the governor said from the Statehouse as his wife Dina stood, expressionless, at his side. “It was wrong. It was foolish. It was inexcusable.”’
The story contains a lot of background information, allowing the reader to better understand the events leading up to the governor’s resignation: “McGreevey met Cipel four years ago at a reception near Tel Aviv on a visit to Israel sponsored by the United Jewish Federation of MetroWest. At the time, Cipel was working as a spokesman for the mayor of his hometown, Rishon Lezion, after a stint as chief information officer for the Israeli Consulate in New York.”
The writers explore the ramifications for the family by telling the reader about McGreevey’s family: “Among other things, he acknowledged the pain he has caused to his wife, Dina, his former wife, Kari Schutz, and his two daughters, 3-year-old Jacqueline and 11-year-old Morag.”
They also broadened the scope of the story by discussing the impact McGreevey’s resignation would have on New Jersey politics: “Republicans described the delay of McGreevey’s departure as a ploy to preserve Democratic control of state government. Former Gov. Christie Whitman, for one, called for McGreevey to step aside immediately, saying any postponement “smacks of politics.”’
Photographs accompanying the article provide a look at McGreevy that words cannot. In one photo, the governor is teary-eyed, allowing the reader to see just how emotional McGreevey was at the press conference announcing his resignation.
Wilson, Pugmire and Morin won the Pulitzer in 2004 for their reporting on wildfires that devastated parts of California. Like the other articles, theirs had a clear, easy to understand headline and subhead: “Wildfires Destroy 200 Homes – Thousands Evacuate as Flames Scorch 50,000 Acres”’
The story’s lead is also short, but provides a more detailed summary of the events, allowing the reader to get more information without having to read the entire article: “Wildfires driven by winds and high temperatures burned out of control Saturday in the San Bernardino Mountains, triggering firestorms that destroyed more than 200 homes in foothill suburbs and forced the evacuation of thousands of residents from San Bernardino to Rancho Cucamonga.”
The authors also identify those known to have died, as well as information about how they died, allowing readers to best understand the gravity of losses: “Two San Bernardino men were reported dead, apparently from heart attacks, Saturday–one as he tried to evacuate and another as he watched his house burn. They were identified as James W. McDermith, 70, and Charles Cunnigham, 93.”
The story also contains detailed accounts about how events transpired, giving readers a clear idea of how the fires spread: “The blaze, 50 miles east of Los Angeles, spread rapidly along two fronts and late Saturday threatened to burn explosively dry forests devastated by drought and bark beetles. By 9:40 p.m., a separate fire in Crestline had prompted mandatory evacuations of Twin Peaks, Blue Jay and Crestline communities and closed Highway 330, the route to Big Bear, to all traffic.”
The journalists also explore how the fires started, thus explaining to readers how such devastation could occur: “The California Highway Patrol a short time later reported that passengers in a gray van were allegedly seen flicking burning matches out the window as they drove toward Lake Arrowhead.”
The journalists also quote victims, allowing readers to truly understand the emotional devastation felt by those displaced and made homeless: “”My house is already gone,” cried Sonia Sanchez as she stood amid a blizzard of ash and smoke at the corner of Del Rosa Avenue and Marshall Boulevard. “The fire moved so fast that all we got out was my family and our cars.”
Journalists Ian Shapira, Tom Jackman, David R. Anderson, Bruce Nolan, Jeff Whelan, John Hassell, Janet Wilson, Lance Pugmire and Monte Morin are all excellent journalists who prove that despite intense pressure, those working in deadline reporting can produce exemplary stories.